Should we make LB an 18+ website?

Originally Posted by Ginge

still aint seen u counterpoint 2 of my posts fam, u pointed an ad hominem finger n continue 2 do practice it u silly twat ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 PM ----------



lets hav da counterpoint 4 dis den

Already countered this, with my response about legalities.

---------- Post added at 10:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:08 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Ginge

as well as addressin da truth in da assertion dat if u so surer da site in danger, y aint u goin str8 2 admin

I've never asserted that I'm inconvertibly correct. So, there's nothing here to retort to. I've simply addressed your points with further points of my own, and have directed you to responses about those points that I had previously made when applicable.

Originally Posted by Ginge

still aint seen u counterpoint 2 of my posts fam, u pointed an ad hominem finger n continue 2 do practice it u silly twat ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 PM ----------



lets hav da counterpoint 4 dis den

Already countered this, with my response about legalities.

---------- Post added at 10:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:08 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Ginge

as well as addressin da truth in da assertion dat if u so surer da site in danger, y aint u goin str8 2 admin

I've never asserted that I'm inconvertibly correct. So, there's nothing here to retort to. I've simply addressed your points with further points of my own, and have directed you to responses about those points that I had previously made when applicable.

[Ginge]

Originally Posted by Rant

Already countered this, with my response about legalities.

---------- Post added at 10:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:08 PM ----------



I've never asserted that I'm inconvertibly correct. So, there's nothing here to retort to. I've simply addressed your points with further points of my own, and have directed you to responses about those points that I had previously made when applicable.

"inconvertibly" da intellectual act is crumbling ahaha, u shud learn da difference between havin a counter point, and provin ur point, u bin puttin across ur arguments as fact, and if u so steadfast u shud just stop wastin ppls time n take it higher ahaha

[Ginge]

Originally Posted by Rant

Already countered this, with my response about legalities.

---------- Post added at 10:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:08 PM ----------



I've never asserted that I'm inconvertibly correct. So, there's nothing here to retort to. I've simply addressed your points with further points of my own, and have directed you to responses about those points that I had previously made when applicable.

"inconvertibly" da intellectual act is crumbling ahaha, u shud learn da difference between havin a counter point, and provin ur point, u bin puttin across ur arguments as fact, and if u so steadfast u shud just stop wastin ppls time n take it higher ahaha

Has anyone said "strawman" yet?

Has anyone said "strawman" yet?

[Ginge]

nah, rant prefer hypocritically throwin out ad hominem cuz he think it makes him sound mor cultured ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:19 PM ----------

rant, if u wer so sure of da legalities surroundin da issue, n ur primary concern was da wellbein of da site, you'd be writin dis shit up 2 admin, not tryna save face by insecurely tryin 2 assert ur intellectual dominance over a brere who frequents dis site 2 rite about how long his schlong is ahahahaha

---------- Post added at 10:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------

"With no age restriction, or mention to age outside of the small section in the privacy policy, you tread risky waters legally as the site owner in regard to COPPA, and the new reformations to the GDPR in Europe. Something which has the capacity to shut down the site, something I don't want to see happen."
just make ur mind up as 2 wether u tryna protect da site, or seem clever fam, cuz if u rite about da risk of da site bein shut down, my point was y not just rite 2 mods or admin? y enter a discussion wen u sure u dun the research,
2 make every1 think u a hero genius?
dats sum autistic shit rite dere,
point da strawman finger all u want but if u keepin on squabblin, AND u sure ur rite, ur further provin da point, go 2 da mods, go 2 da admin, if u make da change u can cum back n brag 4 ur pats on da back ahahaha

[Ginge]

nah, rant prefer hypocritically throwin out ad hominem cuz he think it makes him sound mor cultured ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:19 PM ----------

rant, if u wer so sure of da legalities surroundin da issue, n ur primary concern was da wellbein of da site, you'd be writin dis shit up 2 admin, not tryna save face by insecurely tryin 2 assert ur intellectual dominance over a brere who frequents dis site 2 rite about how long his schlong is ahahahaha

---------- Post added at 10:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------

"With no age restriction, or mention to age outside of the small section in the privacy policy, you tread risky waters legally as the site owner in regard to COPPA, and the new reformations to the GDPR in Europe. Something which has the capacity to shut down the site, something I don't want to see happen."
just make ur mind up as 2 wether u tryna protect da site, or seem clever fam, cuz if u rite about da risk of da site bein shut down, my point was y not just rite 2 mods or admin? y enter a discussion wen u sure u dun the research,
2 make every1 think u a hero genius?
dats sum autistic shit rite dere,
point da strawman finger all u want but if u keepin on squabblin, AND u sure ur rite, ur further provin da point, go 2 da mods, go 2 da admin, if u make da change u can cum back n brag 4 ur pats on da back ahahaha

Originally Posted by Ginge

"inconvertibly" da intellectual act is crumbling ahaha, u shud learn da difference between havin a counter point, and provin ur point, u bin puttin across ur arguments as fact, and if u so steadfast u shud just stop wastin ppls time n take it higher ahaha

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/de.../inconvertibly

---------- Post added at 05:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Ginge

nah, rant prefer hypocritically throwin out ad hominem cuz he think it makes him sound mor cultured ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:19 PM ----------

rant, if u wer so sure of da legalities surroundin da issue, n ur primary concern was da wellbein of da site, you'd be writin dis shit up 2 admin, not tryna save face by insecurely tryin 2 assert ur intellectual dominance over a brere who frequents dis site 2 rite about how long his schlong is ahahahaha

---------- Post added at 10:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------

"With no age restriction, or mention to age outside of the small section in the privacy policy, you tread risky waters legally as the site owner in regard to COPPA, and the new reformations to the GDPR in Europe. Something which has the capacity to shut down the site, something I don't want to see happen."
just make ur mind up as 2 wether u tryna protect da site, or seem clever fam, cuz if u rite about da risk of da site bein shut down, my point was y not just rite 2 mods or admin? y enter a discussion wen u sure u dun the research,
2 make every1 think u a hero genius?
dats sum autistic shit rite dere,
point da strawman finger all u want but if u keepin on squabblin, AND u sure ur rite, ur further provin da point, go 2 da mods, go 2 da admin, if u make da change u can cum back n brag 4 ur pats on da back ahahaha

Tagged mods to the thread. So, I have "written the mods." But, that doesn't negate that it's a topic of discussion that should be talked about openly among the entirety of the site, and not just amongst myself and the mods. You're welcome to your opinion. Absolutely. And I'm welcome to counter it. No point getting emotional, just because "You're sensitive" wasn't a strong retort to, "There's the potential for a legal issue."

Originally Posted by Ginge

"inconvertibly" da intellectual act is crumbling ahaha, u shud learn da difference between havin a counter point, and provin ur point, u bin puttin across ur arguments as fact, and if u so steadfast u shud just stop wastin ppls time n take it higher ahaha

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/de.../inconvertibly

---------- Post added at 05:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Ginge

nah, rant prefer hypocritically throwin out ad hominem cuz he think it makes him sound mor cultured ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:19 PM ----------

rant, if u wer so sure of da legalities surroundin da issue, n ur primary concern was da wellbein of da site, you'd be writin dis shit up 2 admin, not tryna save face by insecurely tryin 2 assert ur intellectual dominance over a brere who frequents dis site 2 rite about how long his schlong is ahahahaha

---------- Post added at 10:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 PM ----------

"With no age restriction, or mention to age outside of the small section in the privacy policy, you tread risky waters legally as the site owner in regard to COPPA, and the new reformations to the GDPR in Europe. Something which has the capacity to shut down the site, something I don't want to see happen."
just make ur mind up as 2 wether u tryna protect da site, or seem clever fam, cuz if u rite about da risk of da site bein shut down, my point was y not just rite 2 mods or admin? y enter a discussion wen u sure u dun the research,
2 make every1 think u a hero genius?
dats sum autistic shit rite dere,
point da strawman finger all u want but if u keepin on squabblin, AND u sure ur rite, ur further provin da point, go 2 da mods, go 2 da admin, if u make da change u can cum back n brag 4 ur pats on da back ahahaha

Tagged mods to the thread. So, I have "written the mods." But, that doesn't negate that it's a topic of discussion that should be talked about openly among the entirety of the site, and not just amongst myself and the mods. You're welcome to your opinion. Absolutely. And I'm welcome to counter it. No point getting emotional, just because "You're sensitive" wasn't a strong retort to, "There's the potential for a legal issue."

[Ginge]

nah nice try squirmin out, u were referencin my use of da word incontrovertibly, as in undisputably, shit dont work in da context, tag team here's ur straw man shit, not 2 mention proof of my point dat rant's priority is tryna act clever n big, not improvin da site ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Rant

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/de.../inconvertibly

---------- Post added at 05:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 PM ----------



Tagged mods to the thread. So, I have "written the mods." But, that doesn't negate that it's a topic of discussion that should be talked about openly among the entirety of the site, and not just amongst myself and the mods. You're welcome to your opinion. Absolutely. ANd I'm welcome to counter it. No point getting emotional, just because "You're sensitive" wasn't a strong retort to, "There's the potential for a legal issue."

ahaha, u cleerly got uncomfortable n started bitchfittin as soon as sum1 disagreed with u, go rite up ur report fam

[Ginge]

nah nice try squirmin out, u were referencin my use of da word incontrovertibly, as in undisputably, shit dont work in da context, tag team here's ur straw man shit, not 2 mention proof of my point dat rant's priority is tryna act clever n big, not improvin da site ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Rant

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/de.../inconvertibly

---------- Post added at 05:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 PM ----------



Tagged mods to the thread. So, I have "written the mods." But, that doesn't negate that it's a topic of discussion that should be talked about openly among the entirety of the site, and not just amongst myself and the mods. You're welcome to your opinion. Absolutely. ANd I'm welcome to counter it. No point getting emotional, just because "You're sensitive" wasn't a strong retort to, "There's the potential for a legal issue."

ahaha, u cleerly got uncomfortable n started bitchfittin as soon as sum1 disagreed with u, go rite up ur report fam

Originally Posted by Ginge

nah nice try squirmin out, u were referencin my use of da word incontrovertibly, as in undisputably, shit dont work in da context, tag team here's ur straw man shit, not 2 mention proof of my point dat rant's priority is tryna act clever n big, not improvin da site ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 PM ----------



ahaha, u cleerly got uncomfortable n started bitchfittin as soon as sum1 disagreed with u, go rite up ur report fam

inconvertible
ADJECTIVE
1Not able to be changed in form, function, or character.

Sooo, it doesn't work in the context?

Originally Posted by Ginge

nah nice try squirmin out, u were referencin my use of da word incontrovertibly, as in undisputably, shit dont work in da context, tag team here's ur straw man shit, not 2 mention proof of my point dat rant's priority is tryna act clever n big, not improvin da site ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 PM ----------



ahaha, u cleerly got uncomfortable n started bitchfittin as soon as sum1 disagreed with u, go rite up ur report fam

inconvertible
ADJECTIVE
1Not able to be changed in form, function, or character.

Sooo, it doesn't work in the context?

[Ginge]

Originally Posted by Rant

inconvertible
ADJECTIVE
1Not able to be changed in form, function, or character.

Sooo, it doesn't work in the context?

not really g ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 PM ----------

i welcome any1 else 2 engage in rant's 'discussion' so long as u reddy 2 congratulate him on his efforts, n stroke his intellectual ego ahahaha

[Ginge]

Originally Posted by Rant

inconvertible
ADJECTIVE
1Not able to be changed in form, function, or character.

Sooo, it doesn't work in the context?

not really g ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 PM ----------

i welcome any1 else 2 engage in rant's 'discussion' so long as u reddy 2 congratulate him on his efforts, n stroke his intellectual ego ahahaha

Originally Posted by Ginge

not really g ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 PM ----------

i welcome any1 else 2 engage in rant's 'discussion' so long as u reddy 2 congratulate him on his efforts, n stroke his intellectual ego ahahaha

Cool story, bro.

Originally Posted by Ginge

not really g ahaha

---------- Post added at 10:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 PM ----------

i welcome any1 else 2 engage in rant's 'discussion' so long as u reddy 2 congratulate him on his efforts, n stroke his intellectual ego ahahaha

Cool story, bro.

[Ginge]

Originally Posted by Rant

Cool story, bro.

witness da peak of his wit, wen his big words aint scare sum1 off ahaha
seein as u got nothin 2 add 2 da argument but debatin semantics 2 save face...
fuck off u fat autistic cunt

[Ginge]

Originally Posted by Rant

Cool story, bro.

witness da peak of his wit, wen his big words aint scare sum1 off ahaha
seein as u got nothin 2 add 2 da argument but debatin semantics 2 save face...
fuck off u fat autistic cunt