Enough is Enough (HOF Discussion)

Guys...we really need to come together in agreement about the Hall of Fame. At this point, we're nominating people simply off of likability and not even off of accomplishments.

I have no beef with Pulse/Godbody and I don't know anything about the dude....but besides being a well-respected battler, and a long-time known forum troll, what has he done for the site that would qualify him to be a Hall of Famer?

Being well-respected shouldn't grant you access to the Hall of Fame. There are some in the HOF right now with NO titles, NO notable wins, and are there purely off of namesake alone. Hall of Famers should have the titles, skill, and resume to back up their gold jacket.

At this point, we're just nominating whoever just to nominate them. I've combed through the current HOF and there's a number of them who simply don't belong there, and please don't ask me to name names because that'll start a shit talking thread and will distract from the point.

All I'm saying is, nominate people who actually have a resume to their name. Not someone who's likable, popular, or well-respected.

Guys...we really need to come together in agreement about the Hall of Fame. At this point, we're nominating people simply off of likability and not even off of accomplishments.

I have no beef with Pulse/Godbody and I don't know anything about the dude....but besides being a well-respected battler, and a long-time known forum troll, what has he done for the site that would qualify him to be a Hall of Famer?

Being well-respected shouldn't grant you access to the Hall of Fame. There are some in the HOF right now with NO titles, NO notable wins, and are there purely off of namesake alone. Hall of Famers should have the titles, skill, and resume to back up their gold jacket.

At this point, we're just nominating whoever just to nominate them. I've combed through the current HOF and there's a number of them who simply don't belong there, and please don't ask me to name names because that'll start a shit talking thread and will distract from the point.

All I'm saying is, nominate people who actually have a resume to their name. Not someone who's likable, popular, or well-respected.

[RULE]

Name names

:evilvillianemoji:

[RULE]

Name names

:evilvillianemoji:

[KG The Prince]

Sitting in the Hall of Fame yeeeh, and the whole of LB will know ya name

[KG The Prince]

Sitting in the Hall of Fame yeeeh, and the whole of LB will know ya name

[Kiwi Peewee]

Originally Posted by KG The Prince

Sitting in the Hall of Fame yeeeh, and the whole of LB will know ya name

I listened to that song for the first time in months literally 2 minutes before reading this lmaooooo

But in all seriousness, I don't think there's an objective measure of HOF worthiness. At the time he was inducted, Boro had no titles or accolades or anything. Despite that, imo he's one of the worthiest HOFers on the whole site and I think his recent accomplishments just go to prove that. I think that if the majority of people that were around at the same time as a person believe they are worthy of HOF, that is what makes them worthy. The problem is, most of the people from the eras when most HOFers were active aren't here any more.

The biggest problem with the HOF is that there is a lack of clarity. There has never been an official process for determining which nominations succeed; in fact, there's barely been a de facto method that's stayed consistent. I don't think we'll be able to overhaul the HOF to properly reflect the distant past (barring a sudden return of all the old, old, old heads); so instead I think we should focus on shoring it up and getting an official process so that we can get it right for the recent past, the present and the future.

[Kiwi Peewee]

Originally Posted by KG The Prince

Sitting in the Hall of Fame yeeeh, and the whole of LB will know ya name

I listened to that song for the first time in months literally 2 minutes before reading this lmaooooo

But in all seriousness, I don't think there's an objective measure of HOF worthiness. At the time he was inducted, Boro had no titles or accolades or anything. Despite that, imo he's one of the worthiest HOFers on the whole site and I think his recent accomplishments just go to prove that. I think that if the majority of people that were around at the same time as a person believe they are worthy of HOF, that is what makes them worthy. The problem is, most of the people from the eras when most HOFers were active aren't here any more.

The biggest problem with the HOF is that there is a lack of clarity. There has never been an official process for determining which nominations succeed; in fact, there's barely been a de facto method that's stayed consistent. I don't think we'll be able to overhaul the HOF to properly reflect the distant past (barring a sudden return of all the old, old, old heads); so instead I think we should focus on shoring it up and getting an official process so that we can get it right for the recent past, the present and the future.

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Sean Griffey

Guys...we really need to come together in agreement about the Hall of Fame. At this point, we're nominating people simply off of likability and not even off of accomplishments.

I have no beef with Pulse/Godbody and I don't know anything about the dude....but besides being a well-respected battler, and a long-time known forum troll, what has he done for the site that would qualify him to be a Hall of Famer?

Being well-respected shouldn't grant you access to the Hall of Fame. There are some in the HOF right now with NO titles, NO notable wins, and are there purely off of namesake alone. Hall of Famers should have the titles, skill, and resume to back up their gold jacket.

At this point, we're just nominating whoever just to nominate them. I've combed through the current HOF and there's a number of them who simply don't belong there, and please don't ask me to name names because that'll start a shit talking thread and will distract from the point.

All I'm saying is, nominate people who actually have a resume to their name. Not someone who's likable, popular, or well-respected.

Get the fuck out of here. You have absolutely 0 idea what you're talking about. I 1,000% have a resume to my name dickface.

We're talking a bunch of notable wins against Hall of Famers and Grand Champs. In both text and audio. I dont give a fuck what you know me as, you werent here for years putting in work taking out top names. Know your role and play it, new kid

Matter of fact I might be one of 3-4 people that have actually successfully beaten some of the greats in both text and audio. I can count the people on 1 hand that have had equally dominant or more dominant runs across both arenas.

You weirdos love to come out the woodwork and hate. Brush your teeth first and do your hw on me

[Godbody]

Originally Posted by Sean Griffey

Guys...we really need to come together in agreement about the Hall of Fame. At this point, we're nominating people simply off of likability and not even off of accomplishments.

I have no beef with Pulse/Godbody and I don't know anything about the dude....but besides being a well-respected battler, and a long-time known forum troll, what has he done for the site that would qualify him to be a Hall of Famer?

Being well-respected shouldn't grant you access to the Hall of Fame. There are some in the HOF right now with NO titles, NO notable wins, and are there purely off of namesake alone. Hall of Famers should have the titles, skill, and resume to back up their gold jacket.

At this point, we're just nominating whoever just to nominate them. I've combed through the current HOF and there's a number of them who simply don't belong there, and please don't ask me to name names because that'll start a shit talking thread and will distract from the point.

All I'm saying is, nominate people who actually have a resume to their name. Not someone who's likable, popular, or well-respected.

Get the fuck out of here. You have absolutely 0 idea what you're talking about. I 1,000% have a resume to my name dickface.

We're talking a bunch of notable wins against Hall of Famers and Grand Champs. In both text and audio. I dont give a fuck what you know me as, you werent here for years putting in work taking out top names. Know your role and play it, new kid

Matter of fact I might be one of 3-4 people that have actually successfully beaten some of the greats in both text and audio. I can count the people on 1 hand that have had equally dominant or more dominant runs across both arenas.

You weirdos love to come out the woodwork and hate. Brush your teeth first and do your hw on me

I hate when new guys dispute something HOF related. Like it bothered me a lot.

I hate when new guys dispute something HOF related. Like it bothered me a lot.

[Kiwi Peewee]

Originally Posted by Punk

I hate when new guys dispute something HOF related. Like it bothered me a lot.

@Punk that aimed at me or just Saiyan?

[Kiwi Peewee]

Originally Posted by Punk

I hate when new guys dispute something HOF related. Like it bothered me a lot.

@Punk that aimed at me or just Saiyan?

Originally Posted by Lil Talent

@Punk that aimed at me or just Saiyan?

I didn’t realize you posted in the thread tbh.

But it’s to basically the new generation who have no background on the old heads that’s been here since the beginning. Like it make absolutely no sense at all. How you rate someone based off of what they’re doing today?

Originally Posted by Lil Talent

@Punk that aimed at me or just Saiyan?

I didn’t realize you posted in the thread tbh.

But it’s to basically the new generation who have no background on the old heads that’s been here since the beginning. Like it make absolutely no sense at all. How you rate someone based off of what they’re doing today?

[Godbody]

These clowns log in to hate. I probably shitted on them in some thread so in their hurt minds I'm nothing but a forum troll. Forget that I've been here a dime and change battling.

I said it several times idgaf about HOF. But if my name comes up and ya'll gonna talk about me in a thread make sure to include the facts. Not just your bullshit ass perspective that is an obvious smear campaign cuz you got something against me lol

[Godbody]

These clowns log in to hate. I probably shitted on them in some thread so in their hurt minds I'm nothing but a forum troll. Forget that I've been here a dime and change battling.

I said it several times idgaf about HOF. But if my name comes up and ya'll gonna talk about me in a thread make sure to include the facts. Not just your bullshit ass perspective that is an obvious smear campaign cuz you got something against me lol

I honestly still can’t believe it’s the NEW guys with most of the disagreements. If dudes such as @RULE and myself would co-sign a nigga’s HOF thread, take it and run with it.

It’s almost like hip hop. The new generation don’t know shit about hip hop legends but will call them trash. Niggas disrespecting PAC, Big, etc live on camera as if they was around back when they was killing shit

I honestly still can’t believe it’s the NEW guys with most of the disagreements. If dudes such as @RULE and myself would co-sign a nigga’s HOF thread, take it and run with it.

It’s almost like hip hop. The new generation don’t know shit about hip hop legends but will call them trash. Niggas disrespecting PAC, Big, etc live on camera as if they was around back when they was killing shit