LetsBeef & Voting

Originally Posted by Manhattan

That's not a broken multi. That's just a repeated non rhyming word in a multi set. Definitely frowned upon if done more than once in a multi set... it's still not a broken multi.

A broken multi is when the syllable counts don't match in a rhyme scheme.

This is what I tried to explain to stupid ass @TradeMarked

Originally Posted by Manhattan

That's not a broken multi. That's just a repeated non rhyming word in a multi set. Definitely frowned upon if done more than once in a multi set... it's still not a broken multi.

A broken multi is when the syllable counts don't match in a rhyme scheme.

This is what I tried to explain to stupid ass @TradeMarked

[EtH]

My example of a broken multi? I used against Lock haha

[EtH]

My example of a broken multi? I used against Lock haha

[IIAM]

Originally Posted by Punk

This is what I tried to explain to stupid ass @TradeMarked

Proof that his VP should be non existent.

Also it’s funny asf to me when ii see people say this:
“Ever heard of slant rhymes bro,
It’s not broken not capping the first parts makes it so. I know cause I’ve been writing like this since 1865” lmfaoo gtfo

DEMAND proTECTION
EXPAND SECTION

[IIAM]

Originally Posted by Punk

This is what I tried to explain to stupid ass @TradeMarked

Proof that his VP should be non existent.

Also it’s funny asf to me when ii see people say this:
“Ever heard of slant rhymes bro,
It’s not broken not capping the first parts makes it so. I know cause I’ve been writing like this since 1865” lmfaoo gtfo

DEMAND proTECTION
EXPAND SECTION

Not entirely against not capping the non rhyming part.

Just a bit weird if I'm being honest. Because in audio tracks syllable counts aren't always looked at.

"Look we food in the DIN AGAIN"

This can fly on tracks and not get called out enough because the definition of words rhyming is that the end of a word sounds the same.

In text though we analyze every syllable pretty closely and we would call it broke.

Not entirely against not capping the non rhyming part.

Just a bit weird if I'm being honest. Because in audio tracks syllable counts aren't always looked at.

"Look we food in the DIN AGAIN"

This can fly on tracks and not get called out enough because the definition of words rhyming is that the end of a word sounds the same.

In text though we analyze every syllable pretty closely and we would call it broke.

[Manhattan]

Originally Posted by Zezmeril

Not entirely against not capping the non rhyming part.

Just a bit weird if I'm being honest. Because in audio tracks syllable counts aren't always looked at.

"Look we food in the DIN AGAIN"

This can fly on tracks and not get called out enough because the definition of words rhyming is that the end of a word sounds the same.

In text though we analyze every syllable pretty closely and we would call it broke.

[Manhattan]

Originally Posted by Zezmeril

Not entirely against not capping the non rhyming part.

Just a bit weird if I'm being honest. Because in audio tracks syllable counts aren't always looked at.

"Look we food in the DIN AGAIN"

This can fly on tracks and not get called out enough because the definition of words rhyming is that the end of a word sounds the same.

In text though we analyze every syllable pretty closely and we would call it broke.

[TradeMarked]

Originally Posted by Manhattan

That's not a broken multi. That's just a repeated non rhyming word in a multi set. Definitely frowned upon if done more than once in a multi set... it's still not a broken multi.

---------- Post added at 02:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:16 PM ----------

A broken multi is when the syllable counts don't match in a rhyme scheme.

As Eth had mentioned:


Broken is more KIND AND HONEST / LINES IN THE COMMENTS

KIND AND HONEST (4 syllables)
LINES IN THE COMMENTS (5 syllables)

so your saying, If someone adds words between each set. As long aslong as the syllable count matches? - Shit has changed since 09.

[TradeMarked]

Originally Posted by Manhattan

That's not a broken multi. That's just a repeated non rhyming word in a multi set. Definitely frowned upon if done more than once in a multi set... it's still not a broken multi.

---------- Post added at 02:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:16 PM ----------

A broken multi is when the syllable counts don't match in a rhyme scheme.

As Eth had mentioned:


Broken is more KIND AND HONEST / LINES IN THE COMMENTS

KIND AND HONEST (4 syllables)
LINES IN THE COMMENTS (5 syllables)

so your saying, If someone adds words between each set. As long aslong as the syllable count matches? - Shit has changed since 09.

Originally Posted by TradeMarked

so your saying, If someone adds words between each set. As long aslong as the syllable count matches? - Shit has changed since 09.

See this what I'm talking about. Letsbeef's Cassidy over here still think its 2009

Originally Posted by TradeMarked

so your saying, If someone adds words between each set. As long aslong as the syllable count matches? - Shit has changed since 09.

See this what I'm talking about. Letsbeef's Cassidy over here still think its 2009